‘Wow, Korean people are really good at
maths!’,
Exclaimed a friend of mine with sheer
astonishment. I enjoyed my moment of being a child prodigy after deducting with
high intelligence that two hundred and four divided by seventeen was twelve.
Memorizing multiplication as if I was reciting the names of winner in America’s
Got Talent Show, I was a walking textbook and speaking calculator. Awesomeness.
The true is, I was not so much of a prodigy back in Korea. I never was the ‘best friend’ of Maths back in Korea, and I was pretty sure it did not like me that much in return.
One interesting thing about being good at Maths in England was not only in the fact that people thought I was a Maths genius, but also in how people related my ability to being a ‘Korean’. They judged me with a yardstick not only marking my ability as an individual, but as a member of a group. It was as though my nationality was a thin layer I was born with around me, making people see through me with that glasses.
The true is, I was not so much of a prodigy back in Korea. I never was the ‘best friend’ of Maths back in Korea, and I was pretty sure it did not like me that much in return.
One interesting thing about being good at Maths in England was not only in the fact that people thought I was a Maths genius, but also in how people related my ability to being a ‘Korean’. They judged me with a yardstick not only marking my ability as an individual, but as a member of a group. It was as though my nationality was a thin layer I was born with around me, making people see through me with that glasses.
Nationality.
Especially the Korean one. It was not something that I
thought hard about, being a Korean. It was something taken for granted, like
being born with brown eyes or dots on your right cheek. It was merely one of
the groups I belonged to. It was like being a girl, being a student, being a
daughter of my parents, being a member of baseball club and so on. In a multi
layered, complicated process of forming an individual, it was yet another
layer that was added to forming myself. In abroad, t became something more
than that. I felt more ‘Korean’ than ever during my stay in England. ‘Where are
you from?’ was one of the most frequently asked question which usually followed
hellos in first meeting. It was glasses through which others saw me.
National identity itself, as most people would agree, is hard to define. It is being referred to as ‘the spirit of the people’ or ‘an attitude that the members of a nation have when they care about their nation’ or simply, ‘belonging to a nation’. However, one concept of Korean identity is simple. People find ‘sharing the same root’ a powerful factor forming Minjok(민족, 民族), its ethnic group. After all, the word itself—each Min and Jok respectively, represent ‘people’ and ‘division’. Put together, they mean people from the same division, therefore of a same branch from the same body. In that aspect, Korean identity is based on ‘sameness’ among people. As a survey conducted in 2007 in Korea also indicated, 32% of people responded ‘same ethnicity’ as the base of Korean identity. Followed by it was 22% answering ‘culture’, 19% ‘same blood’, and only 12%, the ‘five-thousand years of history’.
When the force comprising Korean identity
is somewhat ambiguous, some might even cast a doubt as to whether Korean
identity does exist or not.
Korean people gathered to mourn after the shooting |
On the other hand, after having been
abroad, I can definitely say Korean identity exists. Korean identity was a
firm platform on which I stood. It had an amazing ability of making me feel sad
or very happy toward a situation to which I was unrelated. Just because I was
not anyone else but a Korean, I rejoiced when Yu-na Kim won gold medals, when Korea
hosted winter Olympics in 2018 in PyeongChang, and was saddened when there was
the shooting incident at Virginia Tech. in 2007. Just hearing someone speaking
in Korean abroad made my head turn, looking for the source of the sound. Korean
community existing in England seemed to support the life in
England. Korean identity for me was like a bonding that I had formed with
Koreans.
"Korean bonding?"-its history
To understand the characteristics and the
essence of Korean nationalism and the concept ‘Minjok’, we have to trace back
and look into the history of our own nation and the scar it bears.
Historically, as the record reflects, Korea
was not the ‘invading’ country that had strong power over other countries. In
fact, it was quite the opposite. In our nation’s history of being invaded by
powers surrounding us, it was one of the strongest factors that shaped the
history of our nation. Although Korean identity may have existed in various
forms, the strong concept of it was brought up to the surface from Japanese colonization.
Japanese government, on trying to censor the ideas of the people, inhibited
publishing such books containing stories of historically famous people, traditional folk tales, cultural and geographical knowledge, anything containing national flag and the national
flower(Mugunghwa), and ones dealing with social movements. Changing
people’s name into Japanese one, implementing ‘Japanese only policy’, brainwashing
people to believe in one ideology and history. On an imminent danger of being swept by the
wave of the foreign invasion, Koreans exerted the power to keep their own colour, Korean
identity.
During that era, the concept was there for
the weak to herd in one place and to fight against the colonial power. In its formation, it was
followed by the strong hatred against Japan. What was needed to do that was the united
idea of the people, the spirit of the people. There needed to be a united idea and
structures from which people felt there was an existing Korean identity. Through publication of history books( Korean independence activist, historian, nationalist and the founder of the nationalist historiography of Korea: Shin Chae-Ho), united version
of Korean characters and grammar(see Joo Si-Gyeong) and education,
people built up the main structure of Korean identity.
Power of Korean identity was also used
after the World War II, preceding the ‘miracle of Han river’—which raised Korea
tremendously fast from the level of the poorest country to the level on which we are standing in 21st century.
South Korea's GDP growth |
Not scarcely
followed by sacrifice of an individual, the formation of Korean nationalism put
the strong emphasis in the ‘group’ and its benefit. After having been through
threatens of Japanese colonization and Korean War, people formed strong groups
which showed who was with or against the group. People working for the colonial
power was called ‘pro Japanese group’ with strong revulsion and still raises question in modern society.
The term ‘commie/the Reds(빨갱이)’,
an insulting word indicating those having communist beliefs.
Present Phenomenon-Where can we find Korean identity?
Looking into the history of our nation and Korean identity, the term is tangled with the history. It shares the scratch of history from specific time, sharing the same scar.
Kim Yu-na |
As time passes, the concept ‘sharing the same
history’ seems to dilute in the minds of people. However, consciously and
unconsciously, Korean nationalism still is a significant force that drives
people to put powers together and act accordingly.
Having a tendency to gather at one place during the time of crisis can be seen as an existing evidence of Korean identity. Take for example gold collecting champaign reported by BBC in 1998 with eight tones of gold collected. Korean people helped our nation go through the time of crisis.
They gather not only during the time of the crisis,
but also in a moment of joy and pride. Seeing Samsung’s thrive in the market or some
foreign recognition of Korea was quite impressive. When Korean athletes won
gold medals news reported great victory won by Kim Yun-A, the ‘figure queen’,
and Park Tae-wan, the ‘marine boy’.
When Psy’s ‘Gangnam style’ climbed up to second place in Billboard chart, the
new ‘style’ swept Korea, the song and the dance being played over and over
again.
Psy's Gangnam Style |
During the Olympic time, people gather at the same place, wearing
clothes of similar colour, shouting the same phrase ‘Tae-Han-Min-Guk(republic
of Korea)’ and ‘Oh, Pil-Seung Korea!’ See the heat and enthusiasm of the people during the Olympics in the video.
Side effects of the misunderstood 'Minjok'
However, being distorted or misunderstood,
it could bear some negative consequences as well. Benefits or the unity of
group, as ‘Koreans’, can easily replace individuality among a group. It can
also ignore the means to approaching the goal as the end could take the value
away from it.
Idea of 'sameness'
Korean identity formed in the past was
about ‘sameness’ (as the word Minjok and ‘same ethnicity’ points out). It bears
some negative consequence as people may fall into the fallacy of having a negative
view toward being different.
When I was in England people would not
hesitate in telling people what they were good at. Whereas in Korea, if people
asked someone if he was good at studying, chances are that he would probably
say
‘Well, I’m not that good’.
Sooner or later, it would turn out that he
is actually the top student in his class. Not a lot would say without
hesitation, ‘Yes, I’m pretty good at that’. Is it simply another form of ‘modesty’?
It is more like fearing being ‘different’ from others. After all, those honest
accounts of themselves may easily be seen as something arrogant in Korean
society. Willingness to conform to the sameness can be also seen in 'trends' which may deprive people of their unique individuality. Being different as a quality standing out with more impacts, foreigners in Korea may have some hard time at first. In a survey conducted in University of Seoul English Magazine in 2012, 88% of Korean students said yes to the question, “Do you think there is discrimination against foreigners in Korea?”
This video is in presented in a humourous manner, but it contains some insight into the treatment of foreigners in Korea.
A homogeneous nation?
Some wrong interpretation about the word
Minjok can be misleading. Some think the factor consisting Korean identity is being a homogenous group, sharing the ‘same blood’, from the same ethnicity. Is having the ‘pure blood’ what forms our national identity?
Being a peninsula and a junction surrounded by powerful countries, Koreans have
gone through several wars with surrounding countries. Whether the people wanted or not, they were to interact with people from other
countries. Even from BC. 2 during the time of Go-Chosun(고조선), ethnic group deriving from China, called Yui-man people(위만족) came down. Some kings had their wife who were foreigners. There even were policies during Goryeo(고려) Dynasty around 10th century promoting incorporating other ethnic groups from collapsed countries, encompassing the region which is now China's territory.
DNA evidence refuting homogenuous society |
Grouping together. Grouping only with 'Koreans' together?
Moreover, there are some people seeking to
find our national identity in disliking or excluding others. As intensified
formation of Korean identity is quite closely related to Japan colonization,
people may relate the feelings toward Japan with their Korean identity.
Whenever there is a clash between Korean and Japanese, there would be a strong reaction. In that aspect, Korean identity still seems to be rooted strongly
to the past. Although there have been some obscurity in the issue of the past
which must have been addressed properly to unravel complex feelings each
country has, we should not source that binds people in negative feelings toward
others.
Future of Korean Identity: in 'ing' form.
We should not find Korean identity—ourselves
as a group after having excluded and pushed away others. Through globalization,
we interact with foreign powers. Globalization is not an option, but a naturally
occurring phenomenon. It essentially means an open market which allows free competition
without barriers among different countries. Not only does it mean sharing
common products but also sharing of similar ideas and commonness which
accompany the products. Modern Korea, too, was affected by this flow of ‘western
influence’.
When people were also asked about the
friendliness of foreign culture, about 46.5% responded that they were similar.
When asked of the preference between western culture and Korean culture When
also asked whether they enjoyed foreign culture more than Korean culture, 78.1%
was for the foreign culture. As interactions from different countries increase,
we are being assimilated to this trend of globalization. Then, in which context
should national identity be found? Is it even necessary in the era of
globalization?
My answer would be—because of the globalization, Korean identity should be a
power that makes people maintain who we are. Instead of being swept
away by the wave of globalization. Nation without an identity is a nation
without a base. Korean identity, despite the weigh and the complicated meanings the
word implies, is not so far away from our daily lives. Being happy and proud when
something good to our country happens. Saying with certainty that he is a ‘Korean’.
Worrying during the time of the crisis. In spite of the constructive criticism one
may throw from time to time, in the end, relying on their original base, Korea.
One step further, playing a role one was given as a member of the set group. Sharing
the concern for the welfare of the country. Wanting to change our country for
the good. Believing in the future and the continuity of our nation. It is the
Korean identity.
Yet, the concept 'Minjok' should not be focusing about being the same with others or excluding those who seem different. After all, a group is formed by different individuals with different colour going in harmony, not by those gathered to be assimilated into a group painted in one thick colour. The relationship between a group and an
individual is not a one-way interaction. Korean identity should be a power to which people attend to complement the weakness and the one that pulls people together to do a work in a unit of a country. In doing so, individual’s thoughts and stance should be reflected to
the fullest, not being painted over by the same wide brush of distorted concept of 'Minjok'.
sources:
1. Wikia-Human science-emergence of the conscious individual
2. [한국문화 정체성은 없다|작성자 섬문화연구소(Korean culture has no Korean identity-by Island Culture Research Team
3. Britannica-Humanism
4. Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy-Nationalism
5.Naver 지식백과(encyclopedia-일제 강점기 금서(forbidden books during Japan colonization)
6. Seoul beats-Korean nationalism uncovered
7.KBS world
8.BBC analysis-Koreans give up their gold to help their country
9. The UOS times-"Members of Multicultural Families, Are They Korean?"
http://times.uos.ac.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=1328
10.After watching EBS special <It's not bad to be different>(Korean site)
http://sahngoh.tistory.com/371
10.After watching EBS special <It's not bad to be different>(Korean site)
http://sahngoh.tistory.com/371
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기